<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Biology on Liam Zebedee</title>
    <link>https://liamzebedee.com/biology/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Biology on Liam Zebedee</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:08:00 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://liamzebedee.com/biology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Understanding Hormones and Data Transfer</title>
      <link>https://liamzebedee.com/biology/articles/understanding-hormones-and-data-transfer/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://liamzebedee.com/biology/articles/understanding-hormones-and-data-transfer/</guid>
      <description>Cells can do distributed computation via hormone diffusion, in which the concentration of a hormone at a cell is a proxy for distance in 3D space from a source emitting it
Every cell is basically a 3D shape with these 3D binding sites. A molecule that has a particular 3D structure can fit into this site like lego. We call the molecules that do this hormones. They are signalling molecules - meaning their structure is their only function - they are not little machines like enzymes/proteins that build things.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Is AlphaFold a scientific theory?</title>
      <link>https://liamzebedee.com/biology/articles/is-alphafold-a-scientific-theory/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://liamzebedee.com/biology/articles/is-alphafold-a-scientific-theory/</guid>
      <description>Dwarkesh Patel asks:
A deeper question about AlphaFold: in what sense is it even a scientific explanation at all? It&amp;rsquo;s not going to have some crazy unforeseen predictive power outside of protein folding, such as say, relativity had on Mercury&amp;rsquo;s precession.
There&amp;rsquo;s a couple of ways you can interpret this:
it&amp;rsquo;s not an explanation at all, it contains little explanations you can extract through interpretability (Magnus Carlsen appears to have changed his game after AlphaZero forensics were published), or it&amp;rsquo;s a genuinely new type of scientific object we don&amp;rsquo;t have the verbs for yet.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
