<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Articles on Liam Zebedee</title>
    <link>https://liamzebedee.com/design/articles/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Articles on Liam Zebedee</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 14:05:52 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://liamzebedee.com/design/articles/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Objects of Design Metaphor</title>
      <link>https://liamzebedee.com/design/articles/objects-of-design-metaphor/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://liamzebedee.com/design/articles/objects-of-design-metaphor/</guid>
      <description>I love this sort of stuff. To me it&amp;rsquo;s a very creative thing, sort of like a design metaphor.
You have two distinct objects - butterfly and jumper - and then some expression of one in terms of another, which just fits.
Dear AI researchers - please make an eval for this. Why can&amp;rsquo;t an AI think symbolically in the visual domain? (maybe using something like DreamCoder?)
The one example I can think of why this is interesting - the old Macbook genuinely used to breathe.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
